Sick Pay Changes 2026: What Sponsors Must Know for Migrant Workers

The introduction of changes under the Employment Rights Act 2025 marks a significant shift in how employers manage sickness absence, particularly for those sponsoring migrant workers under the UK immigration system.

From 6 April 2026, Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) rules have changed. While these reforms aim to improve employee protection, they also create new compliance risks for sponsor licence holders if not handled correctly.

This blog explains what has changed, and, crucially, how it impacts your reporting and sponsorship duties.

1. What Has Changed with SSP?

Under the new regulations:

  • SSP is now payable from Day 1 of sickness (previously Day 4)

  • The Lower Earnings Limit has been removed

  • SSP is now calculated as:

  • £123.25 per week (2026/27) OR

  • 80% of average weekly earnings (whichever is lower)

This means more workers qualify, and they qualify earlier.

For sponsors, this directly affects how absences are recorded and interpreted.

2. Why This Matters for Sponsored Workers

Employers often treat sickness as a purely HR/payroll issue.

However, under the UK Immigration Rules, sickness absence is also a reportable immigration event in certain circumstances.

With SSP now starting from day one, the Home Office is likely to expect greater visibility and consistency in how absences are tracked.

3. Reporting Duties: What Must Sponsors Do?

As a sponsor, you are under a duty to monitor and report significant changes in a worker’s circumstances.

You must report via the Sponsor Management System (SMS) if:

  • A worker is absent without permission for 10 consecutive working days

  • There are significant changes in salary or working patterns

  • The worker stops attending work or disappears from employment

Key Point:

Sickness itself is not automatically reportable, but it becomes relevant where it affects:

  • Attendance

  • Salary thresholds

  • Ongoing employment

4. The Critical Risk Area: Salary Thresholds

This is where SSP and immigration law intersect most sharply.

Sponsored workers must generally be paid:

  • Their minimum salary threshold, and

  • Their going rate

If a worker is on SSP:

  • Their income may drop significantly

  • This could take them below the required salary level

Important:

The Home Office does allow certain permitted salary reductions, including sickness, but:

  • The employment must still be genuine and ongoing

  • The absence must be temporary

  • Proper records must be kept

Failure to manage this correctly can lead to:

  • Sponsor licence compliance action

  • Visa curtailment risks

5. Day-One SSP: A New Compliance Reality

Previously, short absences (1–3 days) were often informal and unpaid.

Now:

  • Even very short absences are formally recognised and paid

  • This increases the expectation that employers:

  • Record absences properly

  • Maintain audit trails

  • Apply policies consistently

For sponsors, this means:

There is no longer a “grey area” for short sickness absences.

Everything must now be documented and defensible.

6. Practical Steps for Sponsors

To stay compliant, you should:

1. Update Your Sickness Policy

Ensure it reflects:

  • Day-one SSP entitlement

  • Reporting and documentation requirements

2. Strengthen Record-Keeping

Maintain:

  • Self-certification forms

  • Fit notes (where applicable)

  • Payroll records showing SSP payments

3. Monitor Salary Impact

Track:

  • When SSP reduces salary below thresholds

  • Whether this falls within permitted exceptions

4. Train Your HR and Compliance Teams

Ensure teams understand:

  • The difference between HR management and immigration compliance

  • When to escalate issues

5. Review Absence Patterns

Repeated or long-term absence may trigger:

  • Sponsorship concerns

  • Questions about whether the role remains genuine

7. Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Treating SSP as “just payroll” and ignoring immigration implications

  • Failing to document short absences

  • Allowing salary to drop without assessing sponsorship impact

  • Not reporting unauthorised absence correctly

  • Assuming sickness automatically protects against compliance action

8. Final Thought: Compliance Is About Evidence

The key question the Home Office will ask is:

“Can you demonstrate that you knew where your worker was, what they were being paid, and that the role remained genuine?”

The new SSP regime increases scrutiny, not because the law says so explicitly, but because the margin for informal practice has now disappeared.

Need Support?

If you are a sponsor managing migrant workers, particularly in health and social care, it is essential to align your HR, payroll, and immigration compliance systems.

At Tulia, we support organisations with:

  • Sponsor licence compliance audits

  • SMS reporting strategies

  • Policies aligned with Home Office expectations

  • Training for HR and management teams

If you need support please book a business immigration consultation here https://calendly.com/info-56205/business-immigration-consultation

Previous
Previous

April 2026 Pay Changes: National Living Wage and Implications for Employers

Next
Next

The UK has tightened Skilled Worker salary compliance