What the New Parliamentary Inquiry Means for Migrants

Many people in our community have seen the announcement from the Justice and Home Affairs Committee about a new inquiry into Settlement, Citizenship and Integration. I want to explain what this means in simple, clear terms for all migrants, families, workers, and communities.

1. What is this new inquiry about?

This inquiry has been launched by a House of Lords Committee (the Justice and Home Affairs Committee).

Their focus is to examine:

  • How migrants settle in the UK

  • What citizenship should mean

  • How integration can be improved

  • Whether the current system is fair, clear, and effective

This is not about just one group it includes all migrants: workers, families, students, refugees, community members, long-term residents, and people who call the UK home.

 The Committee is asking for real stories and experiences to help them understand what is working… and what is not.

This is a chance for migrants to speak up about:

  • Barriers to settlement

  • Unfairness or discrimination

  • Integration challenges

  • Contributions to society

  • Long-term insecurity

  • How current rules affect families, workers, and communities

This inquiry is about the bigger picture of belonging in the UK.

2.How is this different from the Government’s Settlement Consultation?

It is very important to understand that these are two separate things:

 The Government’s Settlement Consultation

  • Led by the Home Office

  • Focuses specifically on proposed changes to settlement rules

  • It is part of the government’s policy-making process

  • It is about what they might change in the future

The government consultation asks questions like:

  • Who should qualify for settlement?

  • What criteria should matter?

  • Should settlement be earned, extended, restricted?

  • Should some workers go first or last?

 That consultation directly affects future immigration rules.

The Parliamentary Inquiry (this new announcement)

  • Led by a House of Lords Committee, not the government

  • Independent of the Home Office

  • Looks at the wider issues of settlement, citizenship, and integration

  • Asks: “Is the system fair? Does it work? How are migrants treated?”

  • Collects evidence and stories to influence debate and shape better understanding

  • They do not make the rules directly

  • But their findings can put pressure on the government

  • And they can highlight injustice, inequality, or discrimination

 The inquiry is bigger, broader, and deeper than the consultation.

3. Why does this matter for all migrants?

Because your story can shape national understanding.

This inquiry allows migrants to talk about:

  • How they contribute to the UK

  • How the system has helped or harmed them

  • How complicated, expensive, or stressful the processes are

  • The impact on families and children

  • The emotional toll of insecurity

  • Discrimination or unequal treatment

  • Barriers to integration

  • The reality behind visas, work, and life in the UK

This is a chance to make sure the voices of migrants are not ignored.

It is not limited to carers.

It is not limited to one visa category.

It is for everyone who lives this journey.

4. Why this matters right now

The UK is currently reviewing immigration, settlement, and citizenship policies.There is a lot of debate, confusion, and fear. Migrants are often talked about but not talked to.

This inquiry opens a door for real people to speak.

To say:

  • “We contribute. We belong. We matter.”

  • To highlight what works and what is hurting families.

  • To challenge unfairness.

  • To shape the future conversation.

5.How you can take part

You can submit:

  • Your story

  • Your concerns

  • Your experience

  • Your suggestions

  • Your ideas about fairness and integration

Use the links below to take part now

Call for evidence

Inquiry: Settlement, Citizenship and Integration

Justice and Home Affairs Committee

NB: You do not need perfect English. You do not need to be a lawyer. Just your honest experience.

Next
Next

Radical Restrictions to Settlement Would Be Unjust and Dehumanising